A Sustainable Oregon

Is Accomplished by

Equal opportunity for all Oregonians

Putting average citizens first in all government actions

Maximize Oregonian's standard of living

Government encourages, rather than inhibits competition

Maximum access to plentiful jobs

Government that welcomes all non polluting industries

Fast and low cost transportation that is self financing

Ending government discrimination against cars.

Maximum opportunity for jobs creation

Limit regulations to those for safety and fraud prevention

Government based on sound principles and science

Outreach to ordinary people not special interests

Home Its Warming,But Acidification Warming Stopped IPCC_Predicts 1/2 of Warming Wrong Data Adjustments Cooling since 1945? Extreme Weather? Extreme Weather? Selected Emails Fraud Of Century? JonesInterview CO2 Innocent! An OK Prediction Data Sources Real Cause of Climate Record Temperature Climate Change Truths Energy Facts Mann's Book Peer Review Error Statistical Errors Its OK to Lie! The Sun OceanHeat Ocean Heat Solar 97 percent of scientists AlGore's Errors IPCC_Disproved IPCC_PeerReview Meteorologist Survey Ask Questions Climate Models Local Food IPCC&CLouds Threats Wegman Why I'm a Skeptic GreenhouseMoon Alternative Energy BigMoneyScaring 450 realist papers Conflict of Interest? Muzzeled Scientists How To Argue Common Ground Hurricane No Proof NW Snow Pack James Hansen Consensus The Hockey Stick 650 Dissenters Easy Solution IPCC Scientists DataQuality Heat Island Is Science Settled? Ocean Level Sea Level Glaciers Ice Sheets Greenland Gore's Mentor OGWC Articles Summary FinancialPapers OtherMotivations PeakOil Ozone Hole Fracking Acid Rain No Limits Videos Printables Links Briffa et al (1998) data

Email WebMaster

A - Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical?

 

An initial point to make is that in the responses to these questions I've assumed that when you talk about the global temperature record, you mean the record that combines the estimates from land regions with those from the marine regions of the world. CRU produces the land component, with the Met Office Hadley Centre producing the marine component.

 

Temperature data for the period 1860-1880 are more uncertain, because of sparser coverage, than for later periods in the 20th Century. The 1860-1880 period is also only 21 years in length. As for the two periods 1910-40 and 1975-1998 the warming rates are not statistically significantly different (see numbers below).

 

I have also included the trend over the period 1975 to 2009, which has a very similar trend to the period 1975-1998.

 

So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other.

 

  B - Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming

 

Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level. The positive trend is quite close to the significance level. Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter periods.

 

C - Do you agree that from January 2002 to the present there has been statistically significant global cooling?

 

No. This period is even shorter than 1995-2009. The trend this time is negative (-0.12C per decade), but this trend is not statistically significant.

 

  G - There is a debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was global or not. If it were to be conclusively shown that it was a global phenomenon, would you accept that this would undermine the premise that mean surface atmospheric temperatures during the latter part of the 20th Century were unprecedented?

 

There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia. For it to be global in extent the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern Hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.

 

Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today (based on an equivalent coverage over the NH and SH) then obviously the late-20th century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm that today, then current warmth would be unprecedented.

 

We know from the instrumental temperature record that the two hemispheres do not always follow one another. We cannot, therefore, make the assumption that temperatures in the global average will be similar to those in the northern hemisphere.

 

H - If you agree that there were similar periods of warming since 1850 to the current period, and that the MWP is under debate, what factors convince you that recent warming has been largely man-made?

 

The fact that we can't explain the warming from the 1950s by solar and volcanic forcing - see my answer to your question D.  

 

N - When scientists say "the debate on climate change is over", what exactly do they mean - and what don't they mean?

 

It would be supposition on my behalf to know whether all scientists who say the debate is over are saying that for the same reason. I don't believe the vast majority of climate scientists think this. This is not my view. There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the instrumental (and especially the palaeoclimatic) past as well.

Read the whole Q & A set here  (http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm)

Phil Jones answered some questions put by the BBC

 

Here are some questions & answers that we found interesting

 

Read the whole Q & A set here

 

Sustainable Oregon Comment about this interview:

This is the best case that the warmers have from a leading climate researcher.

It can be stated as :

 

We know the warming, that statistically stopped in 1995, and slightly reversed since 2005, was caused by man’s CO2 because we cannot figure out anything else!